About Me

Name: David
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

This is America. We are Caesar.

Courious. Obama said middle class ends at $150,000 and down in which this bracket of people will receive one form or another of tax breaks. Then he defined rich as anybody making over $250,000. These people he tells us will definately get taxed because he says they can afford it and probably even want to give more of their money to the federal government.

Okay, that's fine, right?

My immediate question, which Dealey made suggestion to: Who are the people between $150,000-$250,000? Why did he omit them? And should we believe that he doesn't intend to raise taxes on that group of people as well?

For those of us in his definition of the middle class, doesn't it almost makes you want to stay right where you are?

My suggestion is give the American people a flat tax rate which would start around 10%. The government could further provide every American with the option to pay 15%, 20%, 25%... 50%... and so on... for those who would like to pay more can then pay more. Especially, those who feel rich enough who feel like they would like to donate more of their money to the federal government. If the government adopted such an idea we would never have to debate taxes again. If the result gave the federal government a smaller budget it would force them to spend the American's people more wisely. If government needed more money this system would force the states to pick up the responsibility for additional spending and pet projects... this would put the focus on state and local officals to spend the people's money on pet projects where there is more accountability.

Render unto Caesar that which belongs to Caesar has been quoted to quiet the low-tax people in the country. But this is America. We are a Democratic-Republic. We are Caesar.  Each of us on the left, right, middle, whereever, make up a piece of Caesar's conscience...
This one says stop the class warefare and give us a system that is more fair and simple.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

God Gives & Takes what is His, and He Is Good

In Response to the comments made on David Limbaugh's column recommending Ravi Zacharias' new book:

If there is a God, the God of the Bible, if He did Create all things including man, then all things belong to Him with which He can do with whatever He wants. And if this is the case then His goodness is not subject to any man's opinion of goodness, right, and wrong... it is uncomfortable I know.

God gave me life.
If God decides to take my life, is he a murderer? Do not all men eventually die?

Is He not the One in control of all life and death? Did I choose my parents or to be born? Do I decide whether I will live to be one hundred or fifty-seven?

Does God not have the right to judge me on His own basis on His own account?
Does God not have the right to judge a group of people?
Did God not give them life?
If my baby dies, is God powerless?
Is He a murderer if He takes it away?

A man is called a murderer because he attempts to play the role of God. Why don't people live to be 120 or even 150 years? Why do some die young and why do some die old? Is that not a judgment that God makes? And yet God has graciously given us doctors and wisdom...

What position am I in to point the finger at God as a murderer for any death?

Though there is one thing I do not feel at liberty to do that other men feel the freedom to do: to make a judgment on God. If I do, does not that make me play the role of God as His superior?

If someone believes that kind of thinking to be naive, then that is what I choose for myself despite that opinion. What is God's opinion?

Many say God does not exist and I wonder if they have stopped to ask him what He thinks of that? I suppose they pray every night that He does not. Has He not been merciful even to those who despise Him? Will physical deeath not come to both those who love God and despise Him?

Don't questions about God's control in matters of life and death suggest that life is sacred? Whether they are short-lived or long-lived, handicapped or capable, that we should value all life as a gift from God? With respect for friend and foe alike? Certainly, when God takes any life it was at His judgment and at His command... whether it happened in the Old Testament or this evening. Who will question Him when that time comes?

It comes to us all...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Men Naturally hate God

It is the natural state of men to hate God. Most men simply need the slightest excuse to dismiss God on any level because the idea of a Supreme Moral Authority is absolutely abhorent to people on a general basis because it requires solemn recognition, followed by (an apparent archaic idea) obedience to SMA's ideas of right and wrong...

But men desire to be gods unto themselves who are the ultimate deciders of what is right or wrong and answering to no one. Who is really shocked by this statement? Cosmic Libertarianism. But if men decide what is right or wrong on their own notions and feelings: then right and wrong become subjective. Under that simple logic, objective definitions of right and wrong would not exist.

Who then is to say two men cannot marry?
Who then is to say it is not okay to partially birth a baby and then suck its brains through a tube?
Who then is to say murder is wrong?
What if (what if) people started to think it was right?
Who then is to make any moral decision on any level? It only becomes relative to what a society decides is normal... thankfully, we still agree murder is still wrong.

There is one thing I ought to never do, which is to make myself into a god. Though every man already has (including myself) when he/she choses what is right or wrong based on his/her own subjective and limited perspective...
Is there no accountability?
Is there no objective right or wrong?

God is no murderer but does He not maintain the right as my Maker to throw me into Hell forever if He sees fit? Or Justify me in the way of His own choosing if He choses?

Maybe unknown to the rest of the world I am the worst of moral violators under any moral code? Will it never be found out?
Who is to say I made any syntax/grammar errors in this paragraph?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Imperfections, Character, Conservatism


Adversity is life's gift that regularly tests our faith and strengthens our character. Nobody asks why when things are going good but when the good times go, most demand a reason to the question why and often times many simply complain. But difficulties are the times when we are stretched and tested.

Ronald Reagan was the first president that I ever knew. I grew up with him as he defined for many of us what it meant to be the President of the United States. Some of the great themes of that time revolved around the Cold War: East vs. West, Good vs. Evil, Machine vs. Man. As kids we used say that Americans had red blood flowing in our veins and the Russians had blue blood. The symbolism was seen in the nineteen-eighties when Rocky fought the machine-like Russian where the Russian fought like a machine but Rocky fought with his soul. That is what I remember most... Reagan fighting the powerful machine called the Soviet Union by talking to the American people about something called Character... Character. Why? Because he believed the soul of the American people is what made this country run and what made this country great and was not simply made great by the strong arms of power of which the worlds of antiquity only knew of.

This political season is not ideal for those who remember Reagan. As time goes on, some of our memories fade a little when thinking back. And in this up and coming election (just as important as those in the past) we have a choice of two candidates.

For many John McCain isn't ideal for those of us who remember past greatness.

But this election is not just about the candidate we have before us... but I believe it is about our own character. When I think about character, I think about a tree with it roots running deep and when the strongest winds and rain blow even some of the branches sway as some of the weaker branches and leaves break away. Nevertheless, the tree stands firm, respecting the forces that had come against it, a little shaken, some places broken, and yet as if to still laugh in the face of it's adversity because it still stands firm.

The American politics of late is one that truly lacks a sense of humor... it is a fierce sport, surely as democracy intended it to be. But don't you remember Reagan laughing? He had a great sense of humor even though there were many great trials... did it have something to do with Character?

Many in the Republican Party can see clearly that the party is torn. But we must hold on to the ideas that were imparted to us, especially that Character and Conservatism always go hand-in-hand.

Today, adversity is testing our faith as Conservatives and as a party, but we also have a great opportunity to be strengthened by it.

Again, for many of us this election is not an ideal situation. Many will want to just sit this out. But may we as Conservatives and as battered Republicans not defeat ourselves by losing vision in the midst of our own faults and imperfections as deep as they may seem. But inspite of them we need to take control, come together, get a sense of humor, smile in the face of our challenges, and work through them.

If we do, I believe we will be better off for it and the Republican Party's character will have proven to be deeper by overcoming its flaws. If not we will be handing the entire government over to those who do not share our core values.

John McCain is not perfect, at times he has even had a hand in compromise, but he is our leader and the only one who stands in the way of keeping our opposition from taking the Presidency and both Houses of Congress. Or will we simply hand it to them?

How will we handle our own imperfections? Will we have the courage to overcome them? Or will we hand the victory over to those who carry another philosophy; a philosophy which is not merely an imperfect Conservatism but a way of thinking and governing that is its complete opposite?

This election, let's carefully consider what is before us:

Pro-Life, Constructionist Judges, Lower Taxes with Spending Contraints, Vetoes on Earmarks, Traditional Marriage, Securing the Borders First, Health Care Empowering Patients,
Win our Wars, Strong Defense, Negotiating from a Position of Strength

vs.

Pro-Abortion, Pro-Partial Birth/Infanticide, Liberal Judges, Higher Taxes without Spending Constraint, Sex-Ed for Kindergarteners, Gay Marriage, No Real Immigration Policy, Nationalized Health Care, Surrender our Wars, Compromised Defense, Negotiating with our Enemies without Pre-Conditions

This election there is a choice. How will we deal with our own obstacles? How will we choose?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tom Delay is Right

 
Washington Times has a story:  Delay: Long rebuilding process for GOP
Aims to get conservative groups to collaborate, by Stephen Dinan, Monday June 9, 2008

Delay's position is that an Obama candidacy will energize Republicans but would set the country back thirty years concering judicial picks to higher courts.  But he has also stated that McCain is strong enough on basic Conservative issues that the party would have something to build on.

We can only hope that McCain wins which would enable Conservatives to reshape the Republican Party over the next two to four years while keeping the Democrat House & Senate at bay... an Obama presidency would energize the party but would set back any real movement in Conservative government where it would be more difficult to get things done later. 

McCain has two years to prove himself to Conservatives to the party.  If he keeps his promises on ear marks, judicial picks, a border fense first, and other important basic issues that Conservatives are primarily concerned about, then the Conservative movement can work independently within the Republican Party and move forward...

He doesn't even need to be successful going head to head with a Democrat House & Senate,

But if he doesn't follow through on his conservative promises then he will be a lame duck by 2010.


My bet is that he will stand next to the promises of his campaign which will bolster Conservatives and give them issues to run on in 2010 and 2012, if he does: the party and Conservatives will move forward, if not: He Loses! 

His rhetoric is RINO but he MUST govern Conservatively or else he will be powerless in two years after winning the White House.  A McCain White House will be better in the long haul for the Conservative movement than an Obama White House.  We have to bet on McCain!

Let Conservatives use McCain how he has used his party!  Let's move forward!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Something Needs to Move to Have a Movement

If Conservatives want to win anytime in the future we are going to have to look at little further down the road!

Obviously, McCain isn't our first choice.

But the choice is between McCain and Barack.

Why don't we try to think positively?

Here is a positive senario:  Democrats win the House and the Senate by large margins, but they fail to win the White House. 

Over the next two years Conservatives will have the opportunity to reorganize to begin a new movement that will be perfectly contrasted against the Maxine Waters types trying to socialize our government, being just as energized by a McCain administration, and at the same time keeping a Democrat majority at bay.

Chances are Conservatives will not make up for all that has been lost in the House and Senate even in two years!! but will be looking considerably better by the next presidential election... and atleast will begin to put a movement in place to keep a Democrat president from putting major liberal reforms in place in four years if there is a Democrat president then... unlike this year when the most liberal senator to run for president will have Democrat majorities in both Houses of Congress!!!  and nobody in Congress to stop them!!!

McCain is pro-life, will appoint constructionist judges, will vetoe all ear-marks, and is for traditional marriage...

When McCain does his first vetoes on ear-marks, the Dems will probably have majorities in Congress to override, which will be a great rallying call for Conservatives while still rejecting many flawed points McCain represents.

Conservatives need to think pragmatically in order to win in 2010 and in 2012!!! McCain is the only person in the way from stopping the Dems of getting the presidency while they are definately keeping both Houses this cycle, and who would be making liberal appointments to make majorities in the Supreme Court. 

How many years did William Wilberforce have to fight to end slavery in Great Britain?  How many years did Reagan rally against Communism? How many years did Chuchill warn against the threats of Nazi Germany?  Will it still not be many years before abortions are finally outlawed?  Will we not always have to fight for our values as we have seen how quickly our culture has changed in the last couple of decades for better or worse? If Conservatives want to win at all we have to be in it for the long haul...
 
If we want a leader to lead the Conservative movement, let that person come out from among something that is already moving...
 
This time the choice is between McCain and Barack!! Conservatives need to embrace what is right about McCain and reject what is wrong. 

A Barack presidency is unacceptable!  If he wins he will breathe new life into the Democrat Party...
 
If we fail to support McCain, the Conservative movement will be shooting itself in the foot and we still have a long marathon of history still ahead of us!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »